35mm vs Medium Format
Format Specifications
The selection of a specific film format fundamentally dictates the structural and aesthetic outcome of a visual commission. This index outlines the mechanical differences between 35mm and medium format systems, contrasting the kinetic efficiency of the former with the spatial resolution of the latter. These parameters are provided to inform the technical brief for your session.
35mm
What is 35mm?
The 35mm format is an established industry standard engineered for mobility and kinetic observation. It is highly suited for documentary-style narratives and unscripted environmental portraiture. The physical footprint of the camera system allows for a rapid response to transient lighting and subject movement.
Operational Characteristics:
-
Structural Ratio: Utilises a standard 3:2 aspect ratio, establishing a classic cinematic frame for visual storytelling.
-
Exposure Volume: Yields up to 36 exposures per roll, accommodating a higher frequency of capture and continuous sequential observation.
-
Material Texture: Renders a distinct silver halide grain structure, contributing a raw and tangible texture to the final image.
-
Agility and Pacing: The compact mechanics of 35mm systems facilitate efficient reloading and a sustained, fluid session momentum.
Medium Format
What is Medium Format?
Medium format systems utilise a significantly larger physical negative area, resulting in a substantial increase in spatial resolution and tonal transition. This format demands a slower, more deliberate operational pace, transforming the session into a rigorous, intentional study of the subject. It is the optimal choice for high-fidelity editorial commissions and structured visual archiving.
Operational Characteristics:
-
Optical Resolution: The expanded negative area captures micro-contrast, intricate textile details, and subtle light falloff with high precision.
-
Configurable Ratios: Operates across multiple aspect ratios depending on the selected camera body, including 6x4.5, 6x6, and 6x7 formats.
-
Exposure Constraint: Strictly limits the exposure volume to between 10 and 15 frames per roll, enforcing absolute compositional discipline prior to shutter actuation.
-
Depth of Field: Achieves a distinctively shallow depth of field, effectively isolating the subject from the surrounding environment with smooth optical rendering.
Side-by-Side Comparison
See the Difference: 35mm (Left) vs Medium Format (Right)
The comparative visual tools provided on this platform demonstrate the general mechanical shift in rendering depth and spatial compression between the two formats.
Please be advised that visual comparisons are inherently subject to multiple variables. Variances in specific film emulsions, lens focal lengths, and environmental lighting fundamentally alter the final output. These visual samples are intended solely as an objective structural reference to assist in determining the technical direction of your commission.
Left: Nikon FE2, 85mm f1.8 | Kodak ColorPlus 200
Right: Pentax 67, 165mm f2.8 | Lomography 100
Left: Nikon F3 HP, 28mm f2.8 | Kodak Vision 3 250D
Right: Pentax 67, 165mm f2.8 | Lomography 400
Left: Nikon F3 HP, 85mm f1.8 | Ilford HP5+ 400
Right: Bronica S2A, 75mm f2.8 | Ilford HP5+ 400
Left: Nikon F3 HP, 105mm f2.5 | Fujifilm Fujicolor 100
Right: Pentax 67, 165mm f2.8 | Kodak Ektar 100
Left: Nikon F3 HP, 105mm f2.5 | Kodak Aerocolor IV
Right: Pentax 67, 165mm f2.8 | Lomography 800
Left: Nikon F3 HP, 28mm f2.8 | Kodak Ektachrome E100
Right: Mamiya RB67 Pro-S 67, 90mm f3.8 | Kodak Ektar 100
Left: Nikon FE2, Voigtländer 40mm Ultron SL-IIs | Kodak Vision3 250D
Right: Bronica S2A, 75mm f2.8 | Kodak Portra 160